now, let come to my 2nd question.Dr. M.Din, 2nd allegation is that Adam was the first man created and there was no human being before him, except, Jin. now, the hypocicy of M.Din is that, he discussed the topic of "adam to be the first man" apart from Allama Pervez's concept of Jin. He clearly said in Mafhoom ul Quran and Mutalib ul furqan that Jin is not a ghost type creature, but a human being that lives outside the urabn area like nomadic people. He also explain that the temperature of Jin (people who live like nomadic) at the of their creation was higher than the temperature when adam was living in this world. so it means that Jin (nomadic people) lived before Adam, and it is a proof that Adam was not the first man on this planet

now, let come to my 2nd question.Dr. M.Din, 2nd allegation is that Adam was the first man created and there was no human being before him, except, Jin. now, the hypocicy of M.Din is that, he discuss the topic of "adam to be the first man" apart from Allama Pervez the concept of Jin. He clearly said in Mafhoom ul Quran and Mutalib ul furqan that Jin is not a ghost type creature, but a human being that lives outside the urabn area like nomadic people. He also explain that the temperature of Jin (people who live like nomadic) at the of creation was higher than the temperature when adam was living in this world. so it means that Jin (nomadic people) lived before Adam, and it is a proof that Adam was not the first man on this planet.

This is my comment about the book written by Dr. M. Din Qasmi i.e "Mutlib ul Furqan ka ilmi or tahiqi jayza.". Although i have just read a few paragraph about the topic "Adam", however, i m in a position to express myself, as i consider Allama Ghulam Ahmad Pervez (RA) a great and sincere scholar, so its my right and duty to put forward my reservation about a particular topic. Before going to explain my position, let all accept that Allama Pervez wrote such a Tafsir, which forced Dr. M. Din to select his Tafsir for his PhD.D degree. Now, first allegation which was put forward by Dr. M. Din is that, Pevez took the concept of Adam that he was not prophet, but a man, was taken from M.Ali (a Qadyni)'s Tafsir. So, let me ask, whether all of our concepts about the birth of Adam, the eating of wheat, the story of serpent etc were taken from Torat or from Christiane's religious Bible. Even, Mulana Maududi plagrised these concepts in his Tafhim ul Quran. so i think, this was not a valid allegation put forward by Dr. M. Din Qasmi.with the passage of time, i will put forward my reservation, as i go through this book.